Abstract
An interesting and well documented observation is that the same company receives heterogeneous ESG ratings from different rating providers. Consequently, an important question is whether sorting stocks on ESG ratings of different rating providers results in portfolios that are similar or substantially different regarding their constituents, performance, and risk. We employ the ratings of five rating providers on stocks listed in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), and Japan for the period from 2014 until the end of 2019 and analyze whether the corresponding quintile stock portfolios actually have similar or different portfolio constituents as well as Sharpe ratios, alphas, and idiosyncratic risk. Our analysis indicates that the portfolios considerably differ regarding their constituents. In contrast, and most importantly, Sharpe ratios, alphas, and idiosyncratic risk of corresponding portfolios are not significantly different.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
