Abstract

<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Prior research has established that sharing knowledge across interrelated organizational systems is challenging and complex.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">This is especially the case when organizational change initiatives require changes in how those systems relate to each other.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">This project was an investigation of knowledge processes between interrelated activity systems in a large facilities management organization as a change initiative was implemented.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Interviews with 27 employees representing nine organizational activity systems were the primary source of data, with field notes used to enrich interpretations in this qualitative study.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Results were interpreted using constructs from structurating activity theory.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Participants communicatively constructed cultures of exclusivity in their activity systems, creating boundaries that made knowledge sharing and activity coordination difficult.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">The change initiative was aimed at creating a culture of inclusivity, which was undermined by perceptions that the management activity system engaged in more exclusivity-creating practices than other activity systems. </span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Several contradictions were explicated pertaining to inclusivity and exclusivity. </span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Tensions persist in how systems coordinate around and with conflicting objectives and activities. </span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Conclusions offer theoretical contributions of the analysis and suggestions for using results to improve organizational practices. </span></p>

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call