Abstract

Span categories provide an abstract framework for formalizing mathematical models of certain systems. The mathematical descriptions of some systems, such as classical mechanical systems, require categories that do not have pullbacks, and this limits the utility of span categories as a formal framework. Given categories $\mathscr{C}$ and $\mathscr{C}^\prime$ and a functor $\mathcal F$ from $\mathscr{C}$ to $\mathscr{C}^\prime$, we introduce the notion of an $\mathcal F$ pullback of a cospan in $\mathscr{C}$, as well as the notion of span tightness of $\mathcal F$. If $\mathcal F$ is span tight, then we can form a generalized span category ${\rm Span}(\mathscr{C},\mathcal F)$ and circumvent the technical difficulty of $\mathscr{C}$ failing to have pullbacks. Composition in ${\rm Span}(\mathscr{C},\mathcal F)$ uses $\mathcal F$-pullbacks rather than pullbacks and in this way differs from the category ${\rm Span}(\mathscr{C})$, but reduces to it when both $\mathscr{C}$ has pullbacks and $\mathcal F$ is the identity functor.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call