Abstract
The presence of coplanar or multiple cracks emerges as a common problem in many engineering structures, e.g., at the toe of circumferential welds of pipelines subjected to cyclic actions and in other piping systems for the nuclear power plants. The failure assessment diagram provides a convenient means to examine the competing failure between the fracture failure and plastic collapse failure, often for structural components with a single crack. The existing failure assessment diagram relies on the leading term characterizing the near-tip stress solutions, and ignores the geometry or plasticity-induced constraint variations. This paper aims to integrate the crack interaction effect between two coplanar cracks, measured by a constraint-based crack interaction factor, into the option 3 failure assessment curve in the engineering standard. This study examines three types of circumferential coplanar cracks in a pipe: two coplanar embedded cracks; two coplanar surface cracks; and a surface crack interacting with an embedded crack. Using a modified J solution based on a proposed crack interaction factor, this investigation quantifies the plasticity-driven increase in the near-tip opening stress for coplanar cracks. The stress field estimated based on this modified J solution agrees closely with the numerically computed stress field near the coplanar crack tips at large deformation levels. This work subsequently integrates the modified J solution into the failure assessment diagram. The failure assessment diagram based on the equivalent crack size recommended in BS7910 appears to be un-conservative for a number of coplanar cracks considered in this study.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have