Abstract
We identified discrepancies between the rotation measure (RM) catalogs by Clegg et al. and Minter & Spangler and their corresponding rows in the Van Eck et al. consolidated catalog. The discrepancies, in the case of Minter & Spangler, are caused by the improper coordinate conversions between J2000 and B1950 Equatorial coordinate systems used between the catalogs. The discrepancies associated with Clegg et al. are due to differences in the number of significant figures reported between the original and consolidated catalogs, which result in overlapping points in the consolidated catalog. These errors affect studies that rely on the accuracy of the coordinate data. After proper unit conversions, we found that coordinate values differed by up to 1° between the Minter & Spangler and consolidated catalogs. Employing a combination of manual data extraction and automated coordinate conversion tools, we corrected and updated those RM coordinate values to align with the standardized format used in the Van Eck et al. consolidated catalog.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
