Consistency Evaluation of Two Loading Devices in Measuring the Perception of Dyspnea.

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the consistency of hand-held electronic incremental threshold loading device (I-TLD) and traditional constant threshold loading device (C-TLD) in measuring the perception of dyspnea (POD) in humans.Patients and methodsThirty-eight patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 41 non-COPD subjects were recruited for the study, all of whom were subjected to an external loading breathing test by gradually increasing the inspiratory load starting from 0 to 5, 10, 20, and 30 cmH2O oral pressure using I-TLD and C-TLD. The Borg score measurement was performed immediately after the loading breath of each level. The linear regression slope a of Borg scores vs percentage of oral pressure from the patients’ maximum represented patients’ POD. The consistency of POD measured by the two devices was analyzed by two Related Samples Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsThere was no significant difference in slope a measured by the two devices in all subjects. The Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the slope a measured by the two devices in the inspiratory loading breath test had a significant correlation: in COPD patients, r = 0.678, (p < 0.001) and in non-COPD subjects, r = 0.603, (p < 0.001). For the results of the Bland-Altman analysis of the whole subjects, 3.8% (3/79) points were outside of the 95% LoA confidence interval (CI) (−10.380, 9.457), and the LoA CI was acceptable, which depicted that the two devices were consistent in their estimation.ConclusionI-TLD was consistent with C-TLD in measuring POD in COPD patients and non-COPD subjects. I-TLD may be used as an alternative method to replace C-TLD to measure POD in COPD patients and non-COPD subjects.