Abstract
Abstract The Wilson conservatism scale has been criticized for its inclusion of poor items. Analysis of responses to a revised version of the scale by 50 subjects in terms of a Rasch-type logistic model confirmed the criticism. Nevertheless, the scale was sufficiently consistent to give a high reliability coefficient; and moderate correlations with Budner's intolerance of ambiguity (r = 44) and with preference for visual complexity (r = −.52) were found.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
