Abstract

Decision-makers (DMs) are often hesitant about the evaluations owing to objective or subjective reasons, and determined preference relations always have various limitations on the way that DMs express their evaluations. To address this, this study investigates the group decision-making (GDM) process with hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs), and develops the methods of consistency and consensus checking and improving processes. To do this, the definitions of best consistency index (BCI) and worst consistency index (WCI) are given. On account of this, the concept of acceptable additive consistent HFPR is proposed. Moreover, the methods of consistency and consensus measurement and improvement processes are introduced for GDM with HFPRs, which can automatically obtain effective and scientific consistency and consensus results. Furthermore, a priority method for HFPRs is employed to rank the alternatives. The procedure of the GDM problem with HFPRs is introduced in detail, and an example of selecting a potential supplier for a solar company is used to demonstrate the proposed method. Comparative analyses shows that the proposed method is more powerful for dealing with the hesitant and uncertain situations and greatly expands the information description scope.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.