Abstract
The article is an attempt to provide a doctrinal answer to the first question posed by the national court in the form of a preliminary question to the CJEU in the case ref. C-387/23. At the same time the text contains considerations on the essence of motor insurance, the construction of atypical recourse of the insurer, as well as, to the extent necessary, refers to the qualification of the consumer in civil and insurance law. Attention was also paid to the stature of the uniform law on the insurance contract using the example of PEICL. Reference is also made to the regulations of national law and final conclusions are made.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.