Abstract

Detecting trends in population size fluctuations is a major focus in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. Populations of colonial waterbirds have been monitored using demographic approaches to determine annual census size (N a). We propose the addition of genetic estimates of the effective number of breeders (N b) as indirect measures of the risk of loss of genetic diversity to improve the evaluation of demographics and increase the accuracy of trend estimates in breeding colonies. Here, we investigated which methods of the estimation of N b are more precise under conditions of moderate genetic diversity, limited sample sizes and few microsatellite loci, as often occurs with natural populations. We used the wood stork as a model species and we offered a workflow that researchers can follow for monitoring bird breeding colonies. Our approach started with simulations using five estimators of N b and the theoretical results were validated with empirical data collected from breeding colonies settled in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland. In parallel, we estimated census size using a corrected method based on counting active nests. Both in simulations and in natural populations, the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) and sibship assignment (SA) methods yielded more precise estimates than the linkage disequilibrium, heterozygosity excess, and molecular coancestry methods. In particular, the ABC method performed best with few loci and small sample sizes, while the other estimators required larger sample sizes and at least 13 loci to not underestimate N b. Moreover, according to our N b/N a estimates (values were often ≤0.1), the wood stork colonies evaluated could be facing the loss of genetic diversity. We demonstrate that the combination of genetic and census estimates is a useful approach for monitoring natural breeding bird populations. This methodology has been recommended for populations of rare species or with a known history of population decline to support conservation efforts.

Highlights

  • Assessing the size of natural populations is a major focus of population monitoring programs aimed at estimating population trends and determining priority species or areas for conservation (Lindenmayer & Likens, 2010)

  • Simulations under ideal conditions are more appropriate for assessing the accuracy of number of breeders (Nb), when the objective is to provide genetic monitoring guidelines for natural populations, one should prioritize the use of a precise estimator under conditions similar to those encountered in nature

  • The applicability of the single-­sample methods for monitoring changes in population size was initially evaluated based on the precision of the estimates measured by the mean percentage of outliers, the mean percentage of finite Nb and the mean percentage of Nb with narrower 95% confidence interval (CI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Assessing the size of natural populations is a major focus of population monitoring programs aimed at estimating population trends and determining priority species or areas for conservation (Lindenmayer & Likens, 2010). Changes in the census size of natural populations either over time (Nc) or annually (Na) can indicate susceptibility to stochastic processes (Lande, 1988). The responsiveness of populations to evolutionary forces depends on population size, and on genetic factors (Frankham, 1996). Measures of effective population size (Ne) and effective number of breeders (Nb) can be more informative than the census size itself (Trail, Brook, Frankham, & Bradshaw, 2010). Ne is the size of a Wright-­Fisher ideal population (Fisher, 1930; Wright, 1931) affected by genetic drift at the same rate as a real population (Crow & Kimura, 1970). Nb is a measure of Ne for a single breeding season, reflecting the parental contribution and changes in the inbreeding rate (Waples, 1990, 2002)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call