Conservative surgical treatment of post-partum hemorrhage: Should we reconsider compression penetrating sutures?

Abstract

ObjectivesEvaluate the prevalence of uterine synechia after total uterine ligation (TUL) in comparison to TUL associated with compression-penetrating-sutures (CPS) in the conservative surgical management of severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). MethodsProspective observational study of pregnant women that underwent conservative surgical management for PPH in a single French tertiary referral center. We compared the risk of uterine synechia with TUL, in comparison to performing TUL in addition to CPS. The synechia rate was calculated after uterine cavity assessment by 3D hysterosonography. Hysterectomies, women with placenta accreta spectrum and patients that received additional embolization treatment were excluded. ResultsOver 6 years, 36 pregnant women underwent surgical treatment for PPH in 21,944 deliveries (1.64 per 1000). The median blood loss was 2700 [1570–3000] milliliters. Twenty-eight (77.7%) women underwent TUL, 8/36 (22.2%) underwent TUL in addition to CPS. Thirty-four (94,4%) cavity assessments were performed 2-to-6 months after delivery, since one woman of each group was lost to follow-up. When TUL was performed in addition to CPS, the prevalence of synechia was 42.9% (n = 3/7), versus 3.7% (n = 1/27) in TUL (p = 0.021; RR = 16.88, 95%CI [1.1–1051]). Synechia was absent in 30/34 (88.2%) women. ConclusionThe prevalence of synechia was very low after TUL unlike CPS. Further studies should evaluate TUL in the conservative surgical management of PPH, to confirm the lower prevalence of synechiae in TUL and evaluate its impact on fertility.