Abstract
ABSTRACT This article presents a critical analysis on the interrelated yet distinctive approaches of various peace processes, namely: peace mediation, peacekeeping and peacebuilding. The critique aims to broaden the understanding of the extent to which peace processes adapt to complex environments marked by cycles of violence, and the extent to which these adaptations align. This understanding is particularly critical given the complexities of current peace processes, which often involve overlapping interventions in persistently violent settings. To address this need, the article draws on the concept of adaptive alignment, which views peace processes as dynamic and interconnected systems that continuously adapt to the evolving nature of complex conflict-affected situations. Adaptive alignment focuses on maintaining peace through adaptability, offering a nuanced understanding of how peace initiatives collectively engage to mitigate violence and achieve sustainable peace. The concept is further illustrated through examination of the specific cases of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Mali.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.