Abstract

Strategy-making is key for realizing sustainable urban water management. Though general barriers and factors for change have been identified, fewer studies have assessed how different conditions influence municipalities’ strategy-making ability and, thus, how to plan strategically given these conditions. Healey’s strategy-making notion was applied to delimit a study of how size, finances, development path, and water organization influence Swedish municipalities’ strategy-making ability for urban water. Three municipalities, Laxå, Norrköping, and Skellefteå, with different, yet overlapping, institutional and socio-economic conditions were analyzed using semi-structured interviews, a stakeholder workshop, and document analyses. The study finds that even though key events have filtered urban water issues into the political agenda, this has not induced systemic change, except where the role of water management in urban development has been specified, i.e., has aligned dispersed planning processes. Organizational setup influences the strategy-making ability by prescribing not only when water issues are raised, but also what system perspective should be applied and what actors that should be enrolled. Judging from the three cases, size, finances, and development path do matter for strategy-making ability, but they appear to be less important than the organizational setup. Departures for improving strategy-making under different conditions are discussed.

Highlights

  • Climate and environmental stress in combination with an aging water infrastructure and ongoing development, densification, and reshaping of cities put high demand on strategy-making for urban water management

  • The results further suggest that even though urban water has emerged as an issue to consider in urban planning, how it should be integrated into urban development is still not settled

  • In line with previous studies, we see that local water challenges aggravated by climate change have increased the need for more strategic water planning in all three case municipalities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate and environmental stress in combination with an aging water infrastructure and ongoing development, densification, and reshaping of cities put high demand on strategy-making for urban water management. Forward-looking plans for and investment in water infrastructures have rarely been prioritized, and pluvial flooding and water pollution have become increasingly severe [3]. Current challenges for sustainable urban water management depend more on our limited understanding of their governance than on access to suitable technical solutions [1]. As found in previous research, path-dependency, sector-focused planning, institutional and legal obstacles, and a complex distribution of responsibilities have been demonstrated to be barriers for the strategic planning of urban water [4]. Studies have stressed the need to increase consideration of

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call