Abstract

Over the last decade, data assimilation methods based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) have been particularly explored in various geoscience fields to solve inverse problems. Although this type of ensemble methods can handle high-dimensional systems, they assume that the errors coming from whether the observations or the numerical model are multivariate Gaussian. To handle existing nonlinearities between the observations and the variables to estimate, iterative methods have been proposed. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using the ensemble smoother and two iterative variants for the calibration of a synthetic 2D groundwater model inspired by a real nuclear storage problem in France. Using the same set of sparse and transient flow data, we compare the results of each method when employing them to condition an ensemble of multi-Gaussian groundwater flow parameter fields. In particular, we explore the benefit of transforming the state observations to improve the parameter identification performed by one of the two tested algorithms. Despite the favorable case of a multi-Gaussian parameter distribution considered, we show the importance of defining an ensemble size of at least 200 to obtain sufficiently accurate parameter and uncertainty estimates for the groundwater flow inverse problem considered.

Highlights

  • Since the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) (Evensen, 1994) has been introduced as a computationally efficient Monte Carlo approximation of the Kalman filter (Kalman, 1960; Anderson, 2003), ensemble methods for data assimilation have been widely used for high-dimensional estimation problems in geosciences (Evensen, 2009b)

  • This paper focuses on the performance of two existing iterative forms of ensemble smoother for a synthetic groundwater flow application

  • Given the nonlinear dynamics of the groundwater flow problem inspired by a real hydraulic situation, the results show the necessity of using an iterative instead of non-iterative ensemble smoother in order to obtain an ensemble of hydraulic conductivity fields which all match properly the data

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Since the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) (Evensen, 1994) has been introduced as a computationally efficient Monte Carlo approximation of the Kalman filter (Kalman, 1960; Anderson, 2003), ensemble methods for data assimilation have been widely used for high-dimensional estimation problems in geosciences (Evensen, 2009b). To the iterative EnKF, successive updates can be applied using iterative forms of the ensemble smoother in order to improve the data fit in non-linear problems (Chen and Oliver, 2012; Emerick and Reynolds, 2012a; Luo et al, 2015). Both are the main iterative variants currently used for inverse modeling in reservoir applications (Evensen, 2018).

GENERAL BACKGROUND ON THE ENSEMBLE SMOOTHER AND ITERATIVE
Normal-Score Transform of State Variables With ES-MDA
A SYNTHETIC INVERSE PROBLEM INSPIRED BY THE ANDRA’S SITE
Model Set Up
Synthetic Data Set
Initial Ensemble of Parameters and Assumptions for the Update Step
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
Ensemble Smoother and Benefit of Data Transformation
Comparing the Accuracy of LM-EnRML and ES-MDA Estimates
Assimilating Both Hydraulic Head and Flowrate Data With LM-EnRML and ES-MDA
CONCLUSION
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call