Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of the relative merits of two schemes for performing concurrent error detection in group look-ahead adders. One of the schemes is a residue mod 3 check and the other is a parity prediction check. The Boolean statements that define the operation of group look-ahead adders, concurrent error detection and the Boolean difference serve as background for interpreting the results of the study. The Boolean difference is a tool for calculating the of elements in a logical network by error-checking schemes. Some weaknesses in prior studies of coverage calculation are brought to light. Tables showingt he number of circuit elements in the various portions of adder and error-checking circuits are given. It is shown that the residue mod 3 check adder is not economical unless the addition operands are already provided with the mod 3 check bits. Thus, a worthwhile comparison of the checking schemes should not proceed without considering the overall data flow checking strategy. In machine organizations with three or more data transfer checks, the parity-checked adder seems to offer a cost advantage.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.