Concrete Leviathan: The Interstate Highway System and Infrastructural Inequality in the Age of Liberalism

Abstract

AbstractThis article explores how the construction of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways prompted litigation that altered the course of administrative law and governance from the 1960s onward. By that time, the construction of the interstate system had become synonymous with thedestructionof neighborhoods and parks bulldozed to make way for the “concrete monsters,” as some came to call the interstates. Ensuing protests—“freeway revolts”—pressed for altered construction practices and participatory roles for citizens and communities in the state building process underway. This article explores the legal consequences of interstate highway protest, and advances two arguments. First, freeway revolts brought distinctive reforms to the practices of modern American state building, particularly when they produced the canonical Supreme Court caseCitizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe(1971). Second, despite the reformist inclinations present inOverton Park, the case created an unequal legal and physical landscape of state building. ContrastingOverton ParkwithNashville I-40 Steering Committee v. Ellington(1967), a case dealing with racial discrimination and community destruction, reveals the mechanics of a legal regime that cemented racial and class hierarchies in place across long horizons of space and time via the interstate system's durable, nation-spanning asphalt limbs.