Abstract

The General Medical Council have closed their formal consultation process soliciting recommendations on how to develop a UK Medical Licensing Assessment (UKMLA). The output of this consultation goes a considerable way to identifying concerns about implementation of such an assessment. However, there is scope for more attention to detail in specifying concerns held by individual UK medical schools, even where these schools have indicated acceptance or approval of the UKMLA. There is therefore a need for increased transparency in identifying stakeholder viewpoints to ensure these lingering concerns can be addressed during the current development phase. The current study contributes to addressing this need through providing an overview of UK medical school views on introducing a UKMLA and relatedly, on shared assessment as a source of uniformity in competency across medical schools. Using a secure online survey system, response data were collected during 13-30 January, 2014 from recommended assessment specialists, representing their respective medical schools. Likert scale and free text response data were collected. Based on Likert sale data, more medical schools appeared accepting of these ideas than either those who expressed disapproval or those who expressed uncertainty. Nevertheless, concerns still lingered. Areas of concern included stifling of curriculum innovation, supporting students who fail the UKMLA and quality and administration of assessment. Eleven recommendations have emerged for addressing respondent concerns. In presenting these recommendations arising specifically from participant feedback, I invite responses from all categories of stakeholder in order to promote open discussion beyond the formal consultation period.

Highlights

  • The General Medical Council (GMC) have progressed from indicating their “support in principle” for a United Kingdom Medical Licensing Assessment (UKMLA) to managing the development of this assessment as the gateway for graduation from UK medical schools

  • We cannot begin to explore this without making sure that we first have the correct foundations in place.” (GMC, 2017b) Previous plans to use this exam as an entrance exam for international medical graduates (IMGs) to practise in the UK have been put on hold in the light of uncertainy arising from Brexit about the future movement of EEA medical graduates into the UK

  • Description: The corresponding statements for which these views were expressed are Shared assessments between universities will result in uniformity of competency between graduates of different medical schools and National licensing examinations should be introduced in the UK

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The General Medical Council (GMC) have progressed from indicating their “support in principle” for a United Kingdom Medical Licensing Assessment (UKMLA) to managing the development of this assessment as the gateway for graduation from UK medical schools. The GMC’s initial proposal involved the release of a three-part assessment of applied knowledge (part 1), professional and clinical skills (part 2) and fitness to maintain a licence to practise (part 3). Their intention was that UK medical students would require to succeed in parts 1 and 2 to register as a doctor and obtain a licence to practise. We cannot begin to explore this without making sure that we first have the correct foundations in place.” (GMC, 2017b) Previous plans to use this exam as an entrance exam for international medical graduates (IMGs) to practise in the UK have been put on hold in the light of uncertainy arising from Brexit about the future movement of EEA medical graduates into the UK

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.