Abstract

Within the context of African cities that are considered to have poor economic prospects and are failing its inhabitants, this article explores and assesses the quality of Durban’s open public spaces through a phenomenological lens, by applying the concept of the sociality of public space and drawing on different theorists’ ideas of what constitutes a good open public space. Various factors have led to the corrosion of open public spaces, including modernism and globalisation and their resultant effects as well as spatial apartheid in South Africa. The following theories are used to understand open public spaces: Jacob’s “eyes on the street”, which supports safer public spaces; Massey’s theory of thrown-togetherness, which advocates for a range of different elements present in public spaces, and Parkinson’s democracy of public space, which encompasses the way in which people express themselves in public spaces. The research methodology includes a literature review, phenomenological ethnographic observations, mapping, and drawing with written narrative. The spaces considered in the study include a range of Durban’s successful and less successful public spaces, including the beachfront, parks, gardens, and a public square. The article concludes that open public spaces are a necessity for quality civic life and are still considered a luxury in Africa. Keywords : Durban open public spaces, sociality, thrown-togetherness, democracy of space

Highlights

  • This article is related to the global concern with the quality of public open space as echoed by UN habitat in their statement that public space is a determinant of the overall quality of cities

  • Some of the causes attributed to placelessness are modernism, globalisation, colonialism and, in the context of South Africa, apartheid planning principles

  • Conceptual commentary of public spaces in Durban, South Africa experience place both individually and collectively in an attempt to counteract the impact of modernism on the urban environment

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This article is related to the global concern with the quality of public open space as echoed by UN habitat in their statement that public space is a determinant of the overall quality of cities. The degradation of public space in Durban can be ascribed to modernism planning principles, globalisation, and apartheid (Sangmoo, 2015: online) This lack of good public space can stunt a city’s economic growth, pollute the environment as well as reduce social stability and security. Kihato (2016: online) argues that cities are the lifeblood of economic growth in Africa She suggests that cities provide the social infrastructure necessary for the inhabitants’ living, regardless of the fact that basic services are often lacking. The main aim of this study is to consider open public spaces as providing urban places in the city of Durban, with a specific focus on the sociality of place as a mechanism of place-making and measure of its quality. A young woman and representative of a minority group in South Africa conducted the fieldwork for the study and provided a specific lens to the views

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF PLACE
Place and placelessness
Perception
Meaning
Dwelling
Place-making
Urban place-making
The sociality of public space
Democratic use of public space
Thrown-togetherness
Eyes on the street
PLACE IN THE CONTEXT OF GREATER DURBAN
CASE STUDY
Gugu Dlamini Park
Botanical Gardens
People’s Park
Francis Farewell Square
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call