Concept of Additional Criminal Replacement Money in the Crime of Corruption under Law No. 20 of 2001 Concerning Eradication Criminal Acts of Corruption

Abstract

The research article entitled The Criminal Concept of Additional Compensation Money in Corruption Crimes Based on Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes with the formulation of the problem and research objectives: What is the concept of additional criminal charges for replacement money in criminal acts of corruption based on Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The approach method used is normative juridical research, and uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Resulting in the following findings/conclusions. The Prosecutor's failure to execute the compensation money in criminal acts of corruption is not optimal, basically it is not something that is desired or intentional, but there are juridical obstacles to the court's decision. The juridical obstacle referred to is the lack of clarity regarding when the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force is carried out, including Article 270 of the Criminal Procedure Code which states that the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force is carried out by the prosecutor, after the clerk sends a copy of the decision letter to him, the provisions This requires that the execution can only be carried out and carried out by the prosecutor, after the clerk sends him a copy of the decision letter, so that the defendant refuses to be executed based on a quote from the final decision, in addition to the court decision not providing a legal basis for what the defendant's belongings have been confiscated.