Abstract

Aperture array (AA) and phased array feed (PAF) systems are envisaged to play an important role in the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), because their multi-beaming capability can be used to improve survey speed and enhance observing flexibility. In this paper, we demonstrate that computing costs and I/O rates should be considered as an integral part of the overall system design. We do so by comparing the correlator and imaging computing requirements for the current SKA phase 1 (SKA1) AA-low baseline design with those for an alternative design with the same survey speed and sensitivity. We also compare the correlator and imaging computing demands and survey speed for the proposed SKA1 survey array (dishes with PAFs), the envisaged SKA1 dish array (dishes with single pixel feeds (SPFs)) and an AA-mid alternative design for the 300-1000 MHz range. We conclude that the current SKA1 baseline design may not be the optimal solution in view of computing requirements (hence operating costs) for given sensitivity and survey speed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.