Abstract

This chapter is a review of studies that have examined false arrhythmia alarms during in-hospital electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring in the intensive care unit. In addition, we describe an annotation effort being conducted at the UCSF School of Nursing, Center for Physiologic Research designed to improve algorithms for lethal arrhythmias (i.e., asystole, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia). Background: Alarm fatigue is a serious patient safety hazard among hospitalized patients. Data from the past five years, showed that alarm fatigue was responsible for over 650 deaths, which is likely lower than the actual number due to under-reporting. Arrhythmia alarms are a common source of false alarms and 90% are false. While clinical scientists have implemented a number of interventions to reduce these types of alarms (e.g., customized alarm settings; daily skin electrode changes; disposable vs. non-disposable lead wires; and education), only minor improvements have been made. This is likely as these interventions do not address the primary problem of false arrhythmia alarms, namely deficient and outdated arrhythmia algorithms. In this chapter we will describe a number of ECG features associated with false arrhythmia alarms. In addition, we briefly discuss an annotation effort our group has undertaken to improve lethal arrhythmia algorithms.

Highlights

  • Patient characteristics were compared in relation to: (1) the number and (2) the duration of false arrhythmia alarms per 24-h period, using nonparametric statistics to minimize the influence of outliers

  • We found that many of these patients often have ECG features that contribute to false arrhythmia alarms, including: bundle branch block (BBB), ventricular paced rhythms, and low amplitude QRS complexes [3,23,24]

  • We found that patients with right or left BBB were 2.2 times more likely to generate false alarms when compared to patients without this ECG feature (p = 0.020) [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Nurses cope with alarm fatigue by: (1) silencing alarms without assessing the patient; (2) lowering the alarm volume; (3) permanently disabling alarms; and/or (4) delay responding by assuming an alarm is false These actions place patients at risk for adverse events, including death, as true alarms are missed. Prior clinical studies designed to reduce false alarms have included: daily ECG skin electrode changes [11,12]; customizing alarm parameters and/or alarm settings [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]; disposable versus non-disposable ECG lead wires [17,19]; and educational initiatives [12,14,17] While these strategies have reduced the total number of alarms by 18% [14,19] to 90% [12], these studies do not address the primary problem of false ECG arrhythmia alarms, namely deficient and outdated arrhythmia algorithms. We will briefly discuss an annotation effort our group has undertaken to improve arrhythmia algorithms for asystole, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia

Overview of ECG False Arrhythmia Alarms
Patient and Clinical Factors Associated with False Arrhythmia Alarms
Frequency
Right or Left BBB
Ventricular Paced Rhythms
Low Amplitude QRS Complexes
Tackling Alarm Fatigue
Annotation Protocol
Discussion
Findings
Conclusions
A Siren Call to Action
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call