Abstract

Individual-level models incorporate individual-specific covariate information, such as spatial location, to model infectious disease transmission. However, fitting these models with traditional Bayesian methods becomes cumbersome as model complexity or population size increases. We consider a spatial individual-level model with a binary susceptibility covariate. A method for fitting this model to aggregate-level data using traditional Metropolis–Hastings MCMC and then disaggregating the results to obtain individual-level estimates for epidemic metrics is proposed. This so-called “Cluster–Aggregate–Disaggregate” (CAD) method is compared to two approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) algorithms in a simulation study. The methods are also applied to a data set from the 2001 U.K. foot and mouth disease epidemic. While the CAD and ABC methods both performed reasonably well at capturing epidemic metrics, the CAD method was found to be much easier to implement and reduced computation time (relative to the traditional model-fitting method) more consistently than the ABC methods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call