Abstract
In an attempt to develop a computationally efficient model for simulation of fatigue crack growth of microstructurally short cracks two dislocation based models have been compared. In both models, the geometry of the boundary and the crack is described using dislocation dipole elements, whereas the plasticity is described either by discrete dislocations or by distributed dipole elements. The two models were found to agree qualitatively as well as quantitatively. It was concluded that modelling the plasticity by dipole elements becomes comparatively increasingly more time efficient with increasing grain size plastic zone size. However, plasticity modelling by dipole elements showed to provide somewhat higher crack growth rates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.