Abstract

Prior research into low-damage wall systems has predominately focused on the walls behaviour in isolation from other building components. Although the response of these isolated walls has been shown to perform well when subjected to both cyclic and dynamic loading, uncertainty exists when considering the effect of interactions between walls and other structural and non-structural components on the seismic response and performance of entire buildings. To help address this uncertainty a computational model was developed to simulate the response of a full-scale four-storey building with post-tensioned precast concrete walls that was subjected to tri-axial earthquake demands on the E-Defence shake table. The model accurately captured the buildings measured response by incorporating the in-plane and out-of-plane non-linear behaviour of both the wall and floor elements. The model was able to simulate the deformation demands imposed on the floor due to compatibility with the post-tensioned walls, closely matching the behaviour and damage observed during the test. Dynamic loading and wall-to-floor interaction were shown to significantly increase the over-strength actions that developed when compared to the wall system considered in isolation.

Highlights

  • Recent earthquakes have confirmed that reinforced concrete (RC) buildings built to modern seismic design standards have generally performed as per the adopted design philosophy by protecting the lives of their occupants

  • Henry et al [10] reported that wall-to-floor interaction increased the lateral-load capacity of a prototype building that utilised unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls by as much as 50% at 2% lateral drift when compared to the prototype building that isolated the floor from the wall uplift

  • The results presented focuses on the wall direction response as the design used for the frame direction, in particular the columns, are not considered representative of New Zealand practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent earthquakes have confirmed that reinforced concrete (RC) buildings built to modern seismic design standards have generally performed as per the adopted design philosophy by protecting the lives of their occupants. The response of the frames in the wall direction was dominated by rocking of the column bases and beam ends, and the modelling method used for the walls was used but with the prestress of the bonded tendons applied as an external axial load. A comparison between the experimental and model global building response in the wall direction during Kobe 25% is shown, where global drift is defined as the displacement at the center of the third floor in the wall direction.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.