Abstract

Formation of multiprotein complexes on cellular membranes is critically dependent on the cyclic activation of small GTPases. FRAP-based analyses demonstrate that within protein complexes, some small GTPases cycle nearly three orders of magnitude faster than they would spontaneously cycle in vitro. At the same time, experiments report concomitant excess of the activated, GTP-bound form of GTPases over their inactive form. Intuitively, high activity and rapid turnover are contradictory requirements. How the cells manage to maximize both remains poorly understood. Here, using GTPases of the Rab and Rho families as a prototype, we introduce a computational model of the GTPase cycle. We quantitatively investigate several plausible layouts of the cycling control module that consist of GEFs, GAPs, and GTPase effectors. We explain the existing experimental data and predict how the cycling of GTPases is controlled by the regulatory proteins in vivo. Our model explains distinct and separable roles that the activating GEFs and deactivating GAPs play in the GTPase cycling control. While the activity of GTPase is mainly defined by GEF, the turnover rate is a sole function of GAP. Maximization of the GTPase activity and turnover rate places conflicting requirements on the concentration of GAP. Therefore, to achieve a high activity and turnover rate at once, cells must carefully maintain concentrations of GEFs and GAPs within the optimal range. The values of these optimal concentrations indicate that efficient cycling can be achieved only within dense protein complexes typically assembled on the membrane surfaces. We show that the concentration requirement for GEF can be dramatically reduced by a GEF-activating GTPase effector that can also significantly boost the cycling efficiency. Interestingly, we find that the cycling regimes are only weakly dependent on the concentration of GTPase itself.

Highlights

  • The Ras superfamily of small GTPases [1] has recently emerged as the central element of a variety of molecular modules that provide spatial and temporal control for protein complex formation in the cell [2,3,4]

  • We further extend the analysis by investigating the contribution of a hypothetic scaffold-like GTPase effector that can form a complex with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and amplify the GEF’s nucleotide exchange activity while bound to the GTP-bound GTPase (RT)

  • The GTPase Control Module We developed a mathematical model to describe how the GTPase cycle is regulated by a generic GEF (E) and GTPase activating protein (GAP) (A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Ras superfamily of small GTPases [1] has recently emerged as the central element of a variety of molecular modules that provide spatial and temporal control for protein complex formation in the cell [2,3,4]. The operation of these ubiquitous control modules is based on the intrinsic property of GTPases to cycle between an inactive GDP-bound state (RD) and an active GTP-bound state (RT). Once brought together by the GTPase-controlled scaffolds, these complexes perform structural and signaling functions crucial for cell existence, for example, actin polymerization [8,9] and activation of the p38 MAP kinase pathways [7,10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call