Abstract
In medicinal chemistry and chemoinformatics, activity cliffs (ACs) are defined as pairs of structurally similar compounds that are active against the same target but have a large difference in potency. Accordingly, ACs are rich in structure-activity relationship (SAR) information, which rationalizes their relevance for medicinal chemistry. For identifying ACs, a compound similarity criterion and a potency difference criterion must be specified. So far a constant potency difference between AC partner compounds has mostly been set, e.g. 100-fold, irrespective of the specific activity (targets) of cliff-forming compounds. Herein, we introduce a computational methodology for AC identification and analysis that includes three novel components:•ACs are identified on the basis of variable target set-dependent potency difference criteria (a ‘target set’ represents a collection of compounds that are active against a given target protein).•ACs are extracted from computationally determined analog series (ASs) and consist of pairs of analogs with single or multiple substitution sites.•For multi-site ACs, a search for analogs with individual substitutions is performed to analyze their contributions to AC formation and determine if multi-site ACs can be represented by single-site ACs.
Highlights
In medicinal chemistry and chemoinformatics, activity cliffs (ACs) are defined as pairs of structurally similar compounds that are active against the same target but have a large difference in potency
Considering different ways in which the compound similarity and potency difference criterion can be specified and applied for AC definition, the following AC categories are introduced: First generation ACs: ACs defined on the basis of a constantly applied similarity criterion, i.e., Tanimoto similarity or substructure-based similarity [1], and a constant potency difference criterion [2], irrespective of the target sets under study
Second generation ACs: ACs defined on the basis of a constant substructure-based similarity criterion and a variable target set-dependent potency difference criterion [3]
Summary
Computational method for the identification of third generation activity cliffs Dagmar Stumpfe, Huabin Hu, Jürgen Bajorath*.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.