Abstract
One out of four dogs will develop cancer in their lifetime and 20% of those will be lymphoma cases. PetScreen developed a lymphoma blood test using serum samples collected from several veterinary practices. The samples were fractionated and analysed by mass spectrometry. Two protein peaks, with the highest diagnostic power, were selected and further identified as acute phase proteins, C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin. Data mining methods were then applied to the collected data for the development of an online computer-assisted veterinary diagnostic tool. The generated software can be used as a diagnostic, monitoring and screening tool. Initially, the diagnosis of lymphoma was formulated as a classification problem and then later refined as a lymphoma risk estimation. Three methods, decision trees, kNN and probability density evaluation, were used for classification and risk estimation and several preprocessing approaches were implemented to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gave a sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provided the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and >99%, respectively (using the same input features). Furthermore, the development and application of new techniques for the generation of risk maps allowed their user-friendly visualization.
Highlights
Lymphoma (Lymphosarcoma, LSA) is one of the most common cancers seen in dogs
Concentration of two acute phase proteins is evaluated: Haptoglobin (Hapt) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Detection of these biomarkers indicates a high likelihood that the dog has lymphoma [1], [2]
We present the case study for both tasks: for the diagnostics task we have tested 2,432,000 variants of the k nearest neighbours method (kNN) method, 248,400 variants of decision tree algorithms and 280 variants of probability density function estimation (PDFE) method; for the screening task we have tested 48,640 variants of kNN, 4,968 variants of decision trees and 280 variants of PDFE
Summary
E M Mirkes, I Alexandrakis, K Slater, R Tuli and A N Gorban Department of Mathematics, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK 2 Avacta Animal Health, Unit 706, Avenue E, Thorp Arch Estate Wetherby, LS23 7GA 3 PetScreen Ltd, Biocity, Pennyfoot Street, Nottingham, NG1 1GF, UK
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.