Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare, in different periods of time, the compressive and diametral tensile strength of a traditional high viscous glass ionomer cement: Fuji IX (GC Corporation), with two new Brazilian GIC's: Vitro-Molar (DFL) and Bioglass R (Biodinamica), all indicated for the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) technique. Fifteen disk specimens (6.0mm diameter x 3.0mm height) for the diametral tensile strength (DTS) test and fifteen cylindrical specimens (6.0mm diameter x 12.0mm height) for the compressive strength (CS) test were made of each GIC. Specimens were stored in deionized water at 37º C and 100% of humidity in a stove until testing. Five specimens of each GIC were submitted to CS and DTS test in each period, namely 1 hour, 24 hours and 7 days. The specimens were tested in a testing machine (Emic) at a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min for CS and 0.5mm/min for the DTS test until failure occurred. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (alpha=0.05). The mean CS values ranged from 42.03 to 155.47MPa and means DTS from 5.54 to 13.72 MPa, with test periods from 1h to 7 days. The CS and DTS tests showed no statistically significant difference between Fuji IX and Vitro Molar, except for CS test at 1-hour period. Bioglass R had lowest mean value for CS of the cements tested. In DTS test Bioglass R presented no statistically significant differences when compared with all others tested GICs at 1-hour period and Bioglass R presented no difference at 24-hour and 7-day periods when compared to Vitro-Molar. Further studies to investigate other physical properties such as fracture toughness and wear resistance, as well as chemical composition and biocompatibility, are now needed to better understand the properties of these new Brazilian GIC's.

Highlights

  • Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements (GICs) were introduced to the dental professional in 1971 by Wilson & Kent[22] as materials consisting of a base-usually an ionleachable, calcium-aluminum-fluorosilicate glass powder – that is combined with polyacrylic acid or its copolymers[16]

  • In diametral tensile strength (DTS) test Bioglass R presented no statistically significant differences when compared with all others tested GICs at 1-hour period and Bioglass R presented no difference at 24-hour and 7-day periods when compared to Vitro-Molar

  • As Brazilian GIC indicated for ART technique are commercially available and no previous study was performed with these materials, the aim of this study was to compare the compressive and diametral tensile strengths of a traditional Glass-Ionomer Cement (GIC): Fuji IX-GC Corporation, with two Brazilian marketed GICs: Vitro-Molar (DFL) and Bioglass R (Biodinamica), all indicated for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) technique

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements (GICs) were introduced to the dental professional in 1971 by Wilson & Kent[22] as materials consisting of a base-usually an ionleachable, calcium-aluminum-fluorosilicate glass powder – that is combined with polyacrylic acid or its copolymers[16]. These cements possess certain unique properties that make them useful as restorative and adhesive materials, including adhesion to moist tooth structure and base metals, anticariogenic properties due to release of fluoride, thermal compatibility with tooth enamel because of low coefficient of thermal expansion similar to those of tooth structure, biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity[7,16]. The approach combines a preventive component with a restorative procedure, and has the potential to be minimally invasive and maximally preserve the tooth structure[9,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call