Comprehensive competencyassessment of malaria microscopists and laboratory diagnostic service capacity in districts stratified for malaria elimination in Ethiopia​.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

BackgroundFederal Ministry of Health (FMoH) Ethiopia achieved significant declines in malaria mortality and incidence and has recently launched malaria elimination in selected low transmission settings. Successful malaria elimination calls for rapid and accurate diagnosis of cases so that the patients can promptly be treated before the occurrence of transmission. Therefore, this study assessed the competency of malaria microscopists using panal slides, and laboratory service availability and readiness in terms of supplies and equipments in malaria elimination targeted districts in Ethiopia.MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted from February to June 2018 in all hospitals, health centers and private clinics in 20 malaria elimination targeted districts, selected out of the 6 regional states in Ethiopia. All malaria microscopists available in the study health facilities during the study period were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for interviewing sociodemography of personnel and laboratory supplies. Per World Health Organization (WHO) criteria set for proficiency testing, 10 Giemsa stained malaria slide panels (8 positive low/high density pf/pv/Mixed and 2 negative slides) were administered to each study participant for performance assessment on malaria parasite detection, species identification and parasite count using light microscopy. The slide panels are PCR confirmed and WHO approved ones, which have been stored in the slide banks at the national reference laboratory in Ethiopian Public Health Institute.ResultIn this assessment, 17(16%) district hospitals, 71(67%) health centers (HCs) and 18(17%) private clinics (PCs) were included. Of the 18 PCs, only 10(55.6%) had license certificate. Of the study facilities, 91.5%(97) use light microscopy, 2.83%(3) use RDTs and 2.9%(3) use both microscopy and RDT to detect malaria. Accessible and appropriate storage of Giemsa was reported by 58.8%(10) hospitals, 81.7%(58) HCs & 72.2%(13) private clinics. Of the 1896 malaria positive & 474 negative slides administered to 237 study participants, 318(16.8%) slides reported falsely negative & 47(9.9%) reported falsely positive. The participants achieved “good” grade [Agreement(A): 84.6%, Kappa(K): 0.6] on parasite detection and “poor” agreement (A: 43.8%; K: 0.11) on every species identification. No or slight agreement seen on differentiation of P. falciparum from other species (A: 28.41%; K:0.29). Above 95%(201) of participants, did not count or used plus system of parasite estimation which is the least accurate and unreccomended method per WHO guideline.ConclusionIn the current study, low performance of malaria microscopists particularly in species identification & poor to moderate capacity of laboratories observed. This is really a great obstacle to malaria elimination strategy of the country. Therefore, national malaria control and elimination program in collaboration with partners is supposed to provide comprehensive training for professionals giving laboratory service and to fulfill laboratory supplies to have the gold standard service.