Abstract

BackgroundChemotherapy has been the current standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, while recent studies showed benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of EGFR-TKI compared with chemotherapy for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after resection from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.MethodA Markov model was established. Clinical data were based on the phase 3, ADJUVANT trial, where stage II-IIIA, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were randomized into gefitinib group or chemotherapy group after resection. Cost parameters mainly included costs of drugs, examinations, and adverse events (AEs). Effect parameters were evaluated by quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Outcomes contained incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), average cost-effective ratio (ACER), and net benefit. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set as 3 times per capita gross domestic product ($30,828/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to verify the stability of the model.ResultsPatients who received gefitinib had both a higher cost ($12,057.98 vs. $11,883.73) and a higher QALY (1.55 vs. 1.42) than patients who received chemotherapy. With an ICER of $1,345.62/QALY, adjuvant gefitinib was of economic benefit compared with chemotherapy. The ACER and net benefit were also consistent (gefitinib vs. chemotherapy, ACER: $7,802.30/QALY vs. $8,392.77/QALY; net benefit: $35,584.85 vs. $31,767.17). Sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of the model and the impact of utility.ConclusionAdjuvant EGFR-TKI application for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was cost-effective compared with chemotherapy, which might provide a reference for clinical decision-making and medical insurance policy formulation in China.

Highlights

  • Chemotherapy has been the current standard adjuvant treatment for earlystage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, while recent studies showed benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)

  • A metaanalysis confirmed the disease-free survival (DFS) benefit of adjuvant Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKI compared with both placebo and chemotherapy (HR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.19–0.93, P = 0.03) for EGFR-mutant patients, overall survival (OS) analysis only showed superior tendency without significant benefit, besides patients administrated with EGFR-TKI had fewer adverse events (AEs) than patients receiving chemotherapy [13]

  • Patients receiving gefitinib achieved a better quality-adjusted life year (QALY) than patients receiving chemotherapy (1.55 vs. 1.42) with an incremental QALY of 0.13, the gefitinib group had a higher cost than the chemotherapy group ($12,057.98 vs. $11,883.73) with an incremental cost of $174.24

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chemotherapy has been the current standard adjuvant treatment for earlystage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, while recent studies showed benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of EGFR-TKI compared with chemotherapy for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after resection from the perspective of the Chinese health care system. Previous studies have shown that postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy could bring survival benefits to NSCLC patients with a 5–10% improvement in 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin is currently the standard adjuvant treatment regimen for resected stage II–III NSCLC patients [7,8,9,10].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call