Abstract

Monitoring of soft-sediment infauna can be a useful tool in impact assessment, but sorting of specimens from sediments may be very time consuming and expensive. This can force a reduction in the intended sampling program, leading to low statistical power and increased uncertainty in decision making. We pooled field samples of marine infauna into composites, then exhaustively subsampled the composites to examine the statistical distribution of organisms in the subsamples. Abundances of organisms among subsamples were generally consistent with a random distribution, with deviations from randomness occurring more frequently for standard replicates than for subsamples. For the most abundant taxa, subsamples had much smaller variances than replicates, and in 76% of cases, the type of sample (i.e., subsample or replicate) had no effect on the mean abundance of organisms recorded. As our subsamples appeared generally unbiased, we then considered the cost and power for hypothetical monitoring programs using an MBACI analysis, and found substantial cost savings and increases in power to detect impact by using compositing and subsampling.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.