Abstract

Seismic evaluation of existing structures is based on determining the damage likely to occur during the lifetime of these structures due to earthquake ground motion excitation. However, there is not a consensus about the acceptable level of seismic damage, the expected lifetime of these structures, and the seismic hazard level(s) to evaluate the structures at. This paper presents a methodology for a parametric calculation of the seismic collapse risk of an existing Reinforced Concrete (RC) frame building based on its seismic code compliance, quantified by a dimensionless metric. This metric, defined as compliance factor, compares the seismic capacity of an existing structure with the seismic demand for a new structure at a predetermined hazard level. The inelastic seismic behavior of four models of the RC frame building of varying compliance was analytically investigated in this study to demonstrate the novel methodology. The four models of the RC building were chosen to represent existing RC frame structures designed and constructed before the introduction of modern seismic code provisions. These four building models were excited by a group of earthquake ground motion excitations using Incremental Dynamic Analysis. The collapse probabilities of the four building models, representing varying values of seismic code compliance, were determined for two different locations corresponding to regions of moderate and high seismic hazard, thus laying the basis for the compliance-based estimation of the seismic collapse risk of existing structures.

Highlights

  • A large percentage of the existing housing inventory worldwide consists of buildings designed before the adoption and enforcement of the modern seismic design codes

  • The assessment of the seismic vulnerability, as an essential component of the determination of the seismic risk of existing buildings, can be performed using three different approaches: An approach based on seismic damage observed in past earthquake events (Anagnos et al 1995), an approach based on analytical simulation of the inelastic seismic response of buildings (Silva et al 2019) and a third approach, which is defined as hybrid vulnerability assessment and is based on an efficient combination of the advantages of the first two approaches (Kappos et al 2006)

  • The Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) was chosen as the earthquake intensity measure (IM) in this study to facilitate a comparison of the analytically derived results with data obtained from experimental campaigns conducted using the chosen Reinforced Concrete (RC) frame building that are based on the excitation of the structure with different PGA levels (Fardis 1996; Dolšek 2008, 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A large percentage of the existing housing inventory worldwide consists of buildings designed before the adoption and enforcement of the modern seismic design codes. Most of these buildings do not comply with the current seismic code provisions and are exposed to a higher seismic damage risk compared to a new structure. Singhal and Kiremidjian (1996) performed nonlinear dynamic analyses of RC frame buildings subjected to artificial ground motion records to propose analytical fragility curves based on the Park-Ang global damage indices (1985). Zeris et al (2002, 2006) highlighted the importance of conducting nonlinear dynamic analysis for an accurate estimation of the local inelastic deformation demand of RC frame buildings, designed before the adoption of the modern seismic code provisions. The increase of the accuracy of this representation necessitates the use of a large set of ground motion records for the conduction of nonlinear dynamic analysis, which can lead to high computational cost

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call