Abstract
Abstract. Streamflow modeling is an enormously challenging problem, due to the complex and nonlinear interactions between climate inputs and landscape characteristics over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. A basic idea in streamflow studies is to establish connections that generally exist, but attempts to identify such connections are largely dictated by the problem at hand and the system components in place. While numerous approaches have been proposed in the literature, our understanding of these connections remains far from adequate. The present study introduces the theory of networks, in particular complex networks, to examine the connections in streamflow dynamics, with a particular focus on spatial connections. Monthly streamflow data observed over a period of 52 years from a large network of 639 monitoring stations in the contiguous US are studied. The connections in this streamflow network are examined primarily using the concept of clustering coefficient, which is a measure of local density and quantifies the network's tendency to cluster. The clustering coefficient analysis is performed with several different threshold levels, which are based on correlations in streamflow data between the stations. The clustering coefficient values of the 639 stations are used to obtain important information about the connections in the network and their extent, similarity, and differences between stations/regions, and the influence of thresholds. The relationship of the clustering coefficient with the number of links/actual links in the network and the number of neighbors is also addressed. The results clearly indicate the usefulness of the network-based approach for examining connections in streamflow, with important implications for interpolation and extrapolation, classification of catchments, and predictions in ungaged basins.
Highlights
Streamflow forms an important input for a wide range of applications in hydrology, water resources, environment, and ecosystem
Its estimation or prediction is an enormously challenging problem, since streamflow arises as a result of complex and nonlinear interactions between climate inputs and landscape characteristics that occur over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales
Model, and predict streamflow have been a central topic in hydrology during the last century or so; see, for example, Salas et al (1995), Grayson and Blöschl (2000), Duan et al (2003), Mishra and Coulibaly (2009), and Hrachowitz et al (2013) for comprehensive accounts on streamflow monitoring, modeling, and prediction
Summary
Streamflow forms an important input for a wide range of applications in hydrology, water resources, environment, and ecosystem. Real networks are neither completely ordered nor completely random, but generally exhibit important properties of both These observations motivated a renewed and fresh look of random graph theory towards the end of the last century (e.g., Watts and Strogatz, 1998; Barabási and Albert, 1999), and gave birth to a new movement of interest and research in studying real and complex networks, under the umbrella of the new science of networks.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have