Abstract

We compare the nondeterministic state complexity of unary regular languages and that of their complements: if a unary language L has a succinct nondeterministic finite automaton, then nondeterminism is useless in order to recognize its complement, namely, the smallest nondeterministic automaton accepting the complement of L has as many states as the minimum deterministic automaton accepting it. The same property does not hold in the case of automata and languages defined over larger alphabets. We also show the existence of infinitely many unary regular languages for which nondeterminism is useless in their recognition and in the recognition of their complements.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.