Abstract
ObjectiveTo define the complexity in end-of-life care and the criteria of complexity, and depending on their grouping within these levels of complexity, to propose a model of intervention that will allow different levels of care to be established, and the framework within which the professionals of primary health care and the palliative team should work. Material and methodsStructure: a technical and interdisciplinary group of consensus formed by ten professional experts in end of life care in the areas of: community health care, palliative care, geriatric care, oncology, social work, bioethics and spirituality; with external collaboration from two professionals of psycho-oncology and internal medicine. Methodology: we established a Delphi type qualitative method to obtain a consensus of all the professionals. The different stages of consensus correspond to the points described in the results. The work took place under the coordination of the Catalan-Balearic Society of Palliative Care, with the collaboration of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine (CAMFIC), and the Directorate of the Social-Health Master Plan of the Health Department of the Generalitat of Catalonia. ResultsDefinition: the complexity is caused by the emerging of processes that, when they interact, fulfil the criteria to be defined complex systems. Reference model: our base model is modelled on the needs of patients and families, thus obtaining six areas of complexity: physical needs, psycho-emotional, socio-family, spiritual, an area related directly with death (situation in the last days, grief), and an area of ethical aspects. Areas and criteria of complexity: in each area the following are obtained: base definitions, situations usually creating complexity, and criteria of complexity grouped in three levels: low medium and high. Model of intervention: the proposal is: low complexity: intervention of the community health care team with occasional intervention by the palliative care team. Medium complexity: shared caring decided between the community health care team and the palliative team. High complexity: main intervention by the palliative team. Hospital admission. ConclusionsIt is necessary to differentiate between situations that are usually complex and the criteria of complexity. The first are those situations that often behave as an emerging process, whereas the criteria of complexity correspond to the actual emergence or its results. The intervention model proposed should improve the collaboration between community care and the palliative care team, as this is a co-responsibility and dynamic model that does not divide the intervention.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call