Abstract

The energy and angular dependence of the double differential cross sections ${d}^{2}\ensuremath{\sigma}/d\ensuremath{\Omega}\mathit{dE}$ were measured for $p,d,t,$$^{3,4,6}\mathrm{He}$, $^{6,7,8,9}\mathrm{Li}$, $^{7,9,10}\mathrm{Be}$, and $^{10,11,12}\mathrm{B}$ isotopes produced in reactions of 1.2- and 1.9-GeV protons on a Au target. The beam energy dependence of the data, supplemented by the cross sections from a previous experiment at 2.5 GeV, is very smooth. The shape of the spectra and angular distributions do not change significantly in the beam energy range from 1.2 to 2.5 GeV. However, the absolute value of the cross sections increases for all ejectiles. The intermediate mass fragment spectra and their angular distributions are very well reproduced by a phenomenological model of two emitting, moving sources, with parameters smoothly varying with energy. The double differential cross sections for light charged particles were analyzed in the framework of the microscopic model calculations of intranuclear cascade, including the coalescence of nucleons and a statistical model for evaporation of particles from excited residual nuclei. However, the energy and angular dependencies of the data agree with neither predictions of the microscopic intranuclear cascade calculations for protons nor the coalescence calculations for other light charged particles. A very good description of the data is achieved by the phenomenological inclusion of the emission of light charged particles from a ``fireball'' (i.e., a fast and hot moving source). It was found that the nonequilibrium processes are very important for the production of light charged particles. They exhaust 40%--80% of the total cross section---depending on the emitted particles. Coalescence and fireball emission yield comparable contributions to the cross sections with the exception of the $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ data where coalescence clearly dominates. For all light charged particles, the ratio of nonequilibrium processes to processes proceeding through a phase of statistical equilibrium does not change significantly between the beam energies of 1.2 and 2.5 GeV.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.