Abstract

The probable extinction of the last confirmed population of northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni) in the world has ignited debate regarding its species status compared to the southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum). Previous studies, based on partial mitochondrial sequences, have reported conflicting results regarding the species status of the northern white rhinoceros. We use whole mitochondrial genomes obtained using Next Generation Sequencing of four northern white rhinoceros and three southern white rhinoceros using novel primers in three overlapping fragments. Phylogenetic relationships were constructed, using Maximum Likelihood, and recovered monophyletic clades for northern white rhinoceros and southern white rhinoceros. The divergence time between the two mitochondrial DNA lineages was estimated to be between 0.46 and 0.97 million years ago using Bayesian inferences. Since there are currently only three surviving northern white rhinoceros individuals these results put into sharp focus the ongoing debate regarding the methods of species definition, and in particular the consequences of such definitions in conservation management of endangered species and subspecies. We conclude that the designation of sub-species status is more applicable to northern and southern white rhinoceros.

Highlights

  • Habitat destruction and extensive poaching pressure have led to an extreme decline of many rhinoceros populations in the wild (Emslie 2011; Emslie and Brooks 1999)

  • The probable extinction of the last confirmed population of northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni) in the world has ignited debate regarding its species status compared to the southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum)

  • The white rhinoceros sequencing results using complete mitochondrial genomes confirmed the results of Tougard et al (2001), which were based on mitochondrial Cytochrome B and 12S rRNA Genes, and those of Willerslev et al (2009) from whole mitochondrial genomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Habitat destruction and extensive poaching pressure have led to an extreme decline of many rhinoceros populations in the wild (Emslie 2011; Emslie and Brooks 1999). There are no other wild populations and currently only three NWR survive in captivity: an old male (named Sudan) and two females, one the daughter of Sudan, in Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya These last three animals were moved to Kenya in 2009 in the hope that a move to more natural conditions might stimulate their breeding, given the generally better breeding performance of wild compared to captive white rhinoceros (Swaisgood 2006). The last hope for rescuing at some of the genetic diversity of the NWR appears to be the successful interbreeding with the SWR, or to attempt more ambitious measures such as Conserv Genet (2016) 17:1285–1291 in vitro fertilization techniques with embryo transfer into surrogate SWR females, or even the use of stem cell technology. The latter would be complicated and costly procedures that have never before been attempted in this species

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call