Comparison of wet bulb globe temperature measured on-site vs estimated and the impact on activity modification in high school football.

Abstract

Exertional heat stroke is one of the top three causes of death in young athletes, particularly high school football players. Despite evidence that these deaths are completely avoidable with appropriate prevention and treatment, deaths still occur at an alarming rate. Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is the preferred method of both the National Athletic Trainers' Association and American College of Sports Medicine to measure heat intensity. Based on the WBGT, activity modification guidelines (AMG) dictate work-to-rest ratios, activity levels and duration, protective equipment worn, and length and frequency of hydration breaks. Due to the cost of handheld WBGT monitors, smartphone apps that estimate WBGT have been considered an alternative. However, it is unclear how WBGT values estimated by these smartphone apps compare to those measured on-site using handheld WBGT monitors. We compared WBGT values estimated by a commercial smartphone app to those taken on-site at the same time and place. Thirteen athletic trainers measured WBGT in the field during high school football practices over a three-month season in North Central Florida. A paired sample t-test indicated the smartphone app significantly overestimated WBGT (29.0°C ± 4.1°C) compared to on-site measures (26.4°C ± 3.2°C) ( r =0.580; t(943)=-23.38, p <0.0001). The smartphone app-estimated values were consistently greater than on-site measures, resulting in potentially unnecessary activity modifications and cancellations if the app was used in place of on-site handheld WBGT monitors. Despite being significantly cheaper than handheld WBGT monitors, at this time, smartphone apps are not ready for widespread use to guide activity modification decisions.