Abstract
Local, area and volume average void fraction measurements have been conducted in gas-liquid two-phase flow through vertical pipes of different diameters under different modes of operation covering up-flow, down-flow and batch bubble column. The measurement techniques used include gamma ray densitometry, electrical resistance tomography (ERT), wire mesh sensor (WMS), optical void probe, and pressure transducers. The consistency among different measurement techniques has been examined by comparing the local, area and volume-average void fraction measurements made using the above methods in the same test section under the same flow conditions. The accuracy of the measurement techniques has been found to depend significantly on the mode of two-phase flow operation. The results show that the gamma densitometry and the pressure transducers can produce highly reliable measurements independent of the mode of operation. However, the optical void probe was found to underestimate the local values of void fractions, particularly, in the case of a co-current down-flow with sub-millimeter sized bubbles. Also, the electrical resistance tomography technique was found to be the least reliable method, as it underestimated the void fraction in the co-current up-flow as well as co-current down-flow operation. The accuracy of the wire mesh sensor was strongly dependent on the size of the bubbles relative to the wire mesh spacing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
