Abstract
AbstractThe performance of two commercially available systems employing dynamic headspace techniques for collection, enrichment, and injection of volatile compounds has been compared by GC analysis of test mixtures and dairy products. For technical reasons, it has not been possible to crate identical sorbent materials for both kinds of trap were not available, the most similar adsorbent available were chosen. The total quantity of volatile compounds from a test mixture at the column head was calculated using a theoretical model which enables comparable working conditions to be obtained. Under these circumstances special attention was paid to the repeatability of the data obtained from a test mixture in order to ensure reliable results in quantitative analysis. Significant differences in repeatability between the two systems seemed to originate from their distinctly different technical designs.A qualitative comparison of the systems has been performed using a sample of Swiss cheese. On the basis of the results obtained the systems have been dedicated to different applications in the laboratory of the FAM.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
