Abstract
Laparoscopic entry is a blind procedure and it often represents a problem for all the related complications. In the last three decades, rapid advances in laparoscopic surgery have made it an invaluable part of general surgery, but there remains no clear consensus on an optimal method of entry into the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this paper is to focus on the evolution of two used methods of entry into the peritoneal cavity in laparoscopic surgery.
Highlights
Access into the abdomen is the one challenge of laparoscopy that is particular to the insertion of surgical instruments through small incisions
The aim of this paper is to focus on the evolution of two used methods of entry into the peritoneal cavity in laparoscopic surgery
Creation of the pneumoperitoneum is the first and most critical step of a laparoscopic procedure because that access is associated with injuries to the gastrointestinal tract and major blood vessels and at least 50% of these major complications occurs prior to commencement of the intended surgery
Summary
Comparison of Two Entry Methods for Laparoscopic Port Entry: Technical Point of View. Laparoscopic entry is a blind procedure and it often represents a problem for all the related complications. In the last three decades, rapid advances in laparoscopic surgery have made it an invaluable part of general surgery, but there remains no clear consensus on an optimal method of entry into the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this paper is to focus on the evolution of two used methods of entry into the peritoneal cavity in laparoscopic surgery
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have