Abstract
The evaluation of knee motion is an important step for correct diagnoses and optimal surgical reconstructions, but controversial opinions still remain about the most suitable numerical method for the elaboration of clinical kinematic tests. In this paper, we present a comparison of three methods applied to an experimental animal study (Grood and Suntay method [Grood, E.S. and Suntay, W.J. (1983) "A coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee", J. Biomech. Engng , 105 , pp. 136-144], Helical Axes method [Blankevoort, L., Huiskes, R. and de Lange, A. (1990). "Helical axes of passive knee joint motions", J. Biomech. , 23 pp. 1219-1229] and Functional method [Martelli, S., Zaffagnini, S., Falcioni, B. and Marcacci, M. (2000). "Intraoperative kinematic protocol for knee joint evaluation", Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. , 62 pp. 77-86]). The study shows the numerical differences among the three protocols and evaluates their performances and repeatability during clinical tests, i.e. laxity measurements and passive range of motion. The Functional method gives the optimal compromise among accuracy, clinical interpretability and ease of use for intraoperative kinematic evaluations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
