Comparison of the Reliability of Three Scoring Systems Used to Decide Whether to Apply Cement in Hip Arthroplasty Among Fracture Patients and the Effect of Surgical Experience: The Spotorno, Dorr, and Canal Flare Indices

Abstract

BackgroundNo consensus has been reached regarding the best index to decide whether to use cement during hip replacement surgery. Therefore, this study compared the reliability of three frequently used scoring systems. The secondary purpose was to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on the decision to use cement. MethodsAnteroposterior radiographs of 60 hips were assessed by four orthopedic surgeons and four orthopedic residents. The observers were asked to make measurements using the Spotorno criteria, the Dorr index, and the canal flare index, and to decide whether to use a cemented or cementless femoral stem. The same X-rays were sent to all participants, in a different order, 4 weeks later, for a second evaluation. The SPSS software (version 24.0) was used for the statistical analysis. Intraobserver agreement was determined for all observers via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and interobserver reliability was calculated using the weighted kappa (κ) statistic. ResultsThe average age of the patients were 73.1 ± 12.1 years. Thirty-three (55%) patients were female and thirty-two (53.3%) had fractures on the right side. Intraobserver agreement was “excellent” for all participants according to the Spotorno criteria. The canal flare index had the lowest intra-observer agreement. The highest interobserver agreement was found using the Spotorno criteria. ConclusionThe intra- and interobserver reliabilities of the Spotorno criteria were higher than those of the Dorr index and the canal flare index. The Spotorno criteria was more useful for deciding between cemented and un-cemented hip arthroplasty.