Abstract
Three kinds of standard specimens, including low-alloy steels (Japanese iron and steel CRM), glass from NIST and Chinese geological reference materials were analyzed by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as unknown samples. The fundamental parameter method was used to correct the matrix effect and different specimens including pure element specimens and type specimens were employed as calibration samples. The quantitative results were compared in order to study the influence of calibration samples on the accuracy of quantitative results. The study showed that the fundamental parameter method could correct the matrix effects very well and relatively accurate quantitative results could be obtained, corrected by simple specimens, in case of type calibration specimens’ absence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
