Abstract

We compare the static electronic performance of the state-of-the-art Junction-Barrier-Schottky (JBS) rectifier (manufactured by ion-implantation) against the Trench-MOS Barrier Schottky (TMBS) rectifier (manufactured by trench-etching and subsequent oxidation). In our 2D numerical simulations, we have chosen identical specifications for the epitaxial drift-layer (3.3 kV application voltage, e.g. traction) and back-side device-design, while investigating the impact of the top-cell active area design on both rectifier IV-characteristics. To enable a meaningful comparison, we designed the depth d of the shields for the electric field E equally deep (p+ peak-plateau dJBS equals trench-depth dt), such that the peak E-field (close to avalanche breakdown) inside the drift-layer of the device is located at a comparable depth near the anode-side of the rectifier (see Fig. 2). By studying systematically the ratio between shield-to Schottky contact-length (w/s ratio), we found that the unipolar conduction state of the TMBS design is basically unaffected by enlarging the Schottky-contact length s, which is enterly different for the JBS-case.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.