Abstract

PurposeTo comply with the effluent regulation of boron, replacement of boric acid with citric acid in a nickel electroplating bath is proposed. Although the bath avoids the discharge of boron, it increases the discharge of nickel owing to the chelating effect of citric acid, which disturbs the wastewater treatment. To balance this trade-off, the environmental impacts of a traditional nickel plating process (the Watts bath) and the citrate bath must be compared by life cycle assessment.MethodsThe life cycle impact assessment method was LIME2. To estimate the trade-off between boron and nickel discharge into wastewater, the characterization and damage factors on human toxicity and ecotoxicity were calculated. The processes were then compared using data from actual processes. The functional unit was “plating per 1-kg part.” However, the plating efficiency depends on the type, shape, and surface area of the part. The data of the citrate bath were modeled. In the modeling, the amounts of nickel chloride and nickel sulfate in the citrate bath were based on the Watts bath.Results and discussionIn comparison with other chemicals, the calculated characterization and damage factors of boron and nickel were found to be reasonable. The integration results revealed that the citrate bath exerted greater environmental impact than the Watts bath. Although the Watts bath involved more environmentally damaging processes than the citrate bath, the sum of these impacts was much smaller than the impact of effluent from the citrate bath. Moreover, the environmental impact of effluent can be significantly reduced by flocculants, with almost no additional environmental impact incurred by the increased sludge.ConclusionsThe newly developed citrate plating bath exerts higher environmental impact than the traditional Watts bath because the environmental impacts of the release of nickel chelated with citric acid exceed the reduced boron emissions. Therefore, there is a trade-off between the two methods. When installing the citrate bath, the wastewater treatment must be altered to reduce the nickel emissions.

Highlights

  • Chemical processes consume and discharge various chemicals and require large amounts of energy, with potentially adverse effects on the environment

  • Global warming and energy consumption were mainly affected by the electricity consumption in bath heating and by processes common to the factory; plating was mainly responsible for resource consumption, acidification, eutrophication, and terrestrial ecotoxicity; solvent degreasing mainly caused photochemical oxidation and released carcinogenic and chronic disease-causing compounds; plating and sludge were responsible for waste; effluent caused aquatic ecotoxicity; plating and electricity consumption polluted the urban area air; and water resources were mainly consumed by the plating process

  • This study evaluated the human toxicity and ecotoxicity coefficients, and the damage factors of human health and biodiversity, incurred by the ejection of boron and nickel compounds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chemical processes consume and discharge various chemicals and require large amounts of energy, with potentially adverse effects on the environment. Among the previous studies on the evaluation and reduction of chemical effects on the environment, Kikuchi and Hirao (2010) clarified the health risks of solvent degreasing processes to workers and neighborhoods. Int J Life Cycle Assess (2018) 23:1609–1623 treatment processes of rinsing wastewater in phosphating processes; Laforest et al (2013) developed a decision-making method for metal finishing that considers both cost and environmental impact. Cespi et al (2014) compared the traditional process of acrylonitrile production from propylene with alternative routes starting from propane. They assessed the sustainability of the production processes from a life cycle perspective and suggested that the LCA methodology can identify the environmental problems associated with the chemical production of a product

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call