Abstract

Background and Objectives : Bleeding and congestion during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) can affect directly to the visibility of safe landmarks and surgical outcomes. Levobupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic with inherent local vasoconstrictor activity that is effective when administered by local infiltration to the skin. We aimed to compare the use of pre-incision levobupivacaine and lidocaine 2% with epinephrine for intraoperative vasoconstriction and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods : After institutional approval and informed patient consent, fifty six patients were randomly assigned to receive preincisional local infiltration under general anesthesia. Group LB received levobupivacaine 0.25% (n=28) and group LD-E (n=28) received epinephrine plus lidocaine 2%. Decongestion level of the middle turbinate, the occurrence of hemodynamic variability, intraoperative bleeding scores, the quality of the surgical field, and the first rescue analgesic time in 24 h of all patients were recorded. At the 10 th minute, nasal mucosa images were more decongested compared to the images at 5 th minute in levobupivacaine and lidocaine plus epinephrine groups (p=0.00 and p=0.01 respectively). Results : Decongestion level of the middle turbinate, intraoperative bleeding scores, the quality of the surgical field and first rescue analgesic time were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusions : Levobupivacaine may be an alternative to lidocaine plus epinephrine because it provides similar surgical visibility and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing FESS.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.