Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect of silicone dressings spray(Unitrump) or silicone dressings paster(Mepiform) on facial incision after surgical operation. Methods 96 cases of facial incision after surgical operation were randomly divided into Unitrump group, Mepiform group and control group according to the digital table, 32 cases in each group.The.clinical effects were evaluated according to scar property and subjective symptoms in patients after 1 month and 3 months. Results The effective rate of the Unitrump group was 53.13% after 1 month, 90.63% after 3 months.The effective rate of the Mepiform group was 56.25% after 1 month, 87.50% after 3 months.The effective rates of the Unitrump group and Mepiform group were higher than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant(χ2=6.667, 7.943, all P 0.05). Conclusion Silicone dressings spray and silicone dressings paster facial are effective on after facial surgery with incision repair, with no obvious adverse reaction.Silicone dressings spray is more convenient to use. Key words: Incision repair; Scar; Silicone dressing

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call