Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation and Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of children with supracondylar fracture of humerus. Methods 88 children with supracondylar fracture of humerus in our hospital were randomly selected.And they were divided into closed group (n=44) and open group (n=44) by taking computer random sequence method.The closed group was treated with closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, the open group was treated with Kirschner wire fixation.The treatment effect and safety of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time [(59.47±12.23)min], hospitalization time [(3.46±1.44) d], fracture healing time[(32.46±7.41)d] of the closed group were significantly shorter than those of the open group (t=5.238, 5.395, 7.841, all P 0.05). Conclusion Compared with open reduction and Kirschner wire internal fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of children with supracondylar fracture of humerus has significant curative effect, it is safe and reliable, which is worthy of promotion in clinic. Key words: Humeral fractures; Comparative effectiveness research
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
