Abstract
This research aims to see a comparison of the analytical abilities of students in class X using problem solving and problem posing learning models. The research method uses quantitative descriptive. The type of research used is quasi experimental research. Based on the research results, it was found that the comparison of the analytical abilities of students in the experimental class 1 class obtained an average of 75.76, experimental 2 obtained an average of 80.47, while the control class obtained an average of 71.41. Based on the results of the hypothesis that has been carried out, it is found that the Sig of experiment class 1 and control is .019, experiment 2 and control is .000 and experiment 1 and experiment 2 is .009 which is <0.05 which is significant which means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. From these three classes, it can be concluded that there is a comparison of students' analytical abilities where the problem posing learning model has a higher average than the problem solving learning model.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
